Your starting point
- Drawings
- Intended use
- Review priorities
Scope detail
The source drawings, the intended use and the checks that matter at the next project gate.
Check existing designs before procurement or installation. Find missing information, inconsistent drawings and unresolved interfaces against an agreed review scope.

Agree the work, the evidence and the people responsible before we begin.
The source drawings, the intended use and the checks that matter at the next project gate.
The drawing conventions, coverage, severity levels and evidence needed to close a finding.
An engineer-reviewed findings register, source-linked evidence and recommended corrections, with unassessed areas clearly identified.
Review effort, useful findings, missed issues on agreed reference cases and time to resolution.
An automated check covers its defined rule and inputs. It does not establish the reliability of an entire machine or replace professional acceptance.
A request in an email can affect a drawing, a component and a check. Keep the reason connected to the work.
“Increase the duty.”
Change to assess“Use the replacement pump.”
Change to assess“Keep this access clear.”
Change to assessEngineer reviews the changes and unresolved questions.
Three sources. One design to keep in step.
Illustrated workflow, not a live engineering run. Automated updates depend on supported methods and agreed scope.
See a calculated plant example ↗A practical place to start
Show us the design, what needs to change and the delivery date. We’ll agree the work, files and price.
Bring us a change